Revealing Revelation – I Think I’ve Heard This Before


Now that we have dealt with the issues surrounding the dating of the book of Revelation our attention will be turned toward the themes and characteristics found in the book itself. Rather than diving headlong into a difficult book filled with imagery, symbolism, visions and unusual language, it serves the reader to try and grasp the main themes explored and the stylistic techniques developed by the author.

In this post we will look at the authors use of repetition and parallelisms. There are several things that repeat themselves or run in parallels in previous sections of the book. This has caused many to believe and understand the books to be a book of “cycles” ever repeating and that it is simply a picture of the totality of history repeating itself. This is not necessary. The truth remains though that there are similarities and repetition devices used.

This is not an uncommon tactic in prophetic writing. Quite often two or more different prophesies or images may be employed to discuss the same events or subjects. One obvious repetitive prophecy is found in the book of Daniel where we are told in Chapter 2 about a statue that represents four different kingdoms. Later, in Daniel 7, we are told about four animals that also represents four different kingdoms. The latter may expound upon the former, but the subject matter stays the same.

The book of Revelation has been, by some, divided up into 7 repetitive cycles. Each cycle presents the “coming” of Christ in a different way and each cycle, it is argued, repeats the same information from a different angle. This has been the view popularized by many Amillennialist. This may not be the best way to read the book, but it is valid in many respects. It may also mean that the warnings become more severe as time progresses finishing with a flurry of judgment actions. Either way, one cannot deny the repetitions found in the book.

Below are a handful of things that show up again and again in the book.

  • Worship at the Throne
  • A Great Battle (Rev 16, 19 and 20)
  • 3 ½ Years (Rev 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 19, 20)
  • The Beast (Rev 12, 13, 17)
  • The “fall” of Babylon

The Trumpet and Bowl Judgments also show a repetitive nature.

  • First affects the Earth (8:7, 16:2)
  • Second affects the sea (8:8, 16:3)
  • Third affects the rivers (8:10, 16:4)
  • Fourth affects heavenly bodies (9:1, 16:10)
  • Fifth affects men (9:1, 16:10)
  • Sixth affects the river Euphrates (9:13, 16:12)
  • Seventh announces the end (11:15, 16:17)

This may or may not mean that the same story is being told over and over again, but it must be considered a viable option when one looks at the evidence. What is most important here, though, is that something in the way of story telling demands that certain items be repeated for emphasis. This may relate to mankind’s inability to learn from the past or it may reflect the history of the Apostate Jews who time after time rejected the one who brought them out of Egypt.

Next we will consider the use of the Old and New Testaments in the book.


3 Responses to “Revealing Revelation – I Think I’ve Heard This Before”

  1. 1 Yeshua the Lord of Glory

    Hi David

    Since i had not asked you this question before i wanted to know BASED on your January 21 post the Son of man “coming ” in the clouds and my comments and your responses to them…

    Do you believe that the day of Pentecost was both the “promised ” regathering of the remnant of Israel and the ingathering or inaugauration of the New Testament/Covenant church into the ONE olive tree?

    I know that you have not yet posted your Israel/church section.So if you can answer in a way not to ” spoil ” It…

    • 2 low5point

      For time being I won’t be doing much more on the Israel/Church distinction since the primary discussion would be in relation to the poor view espoused by Dispy’s, so answering now is not a problem.

      I think it’s a beginning but not the end of it. Matt 24 makes clear the gathering is not a “single moment” event, but one that involves time as His messangers are sent out to gather them together. Plus, in Matt 24 the timing is closer to the destruction and takes place “after” the tribulation “of those days.” I would state that He negins the gathering in a sense, which is obvious by the fact that devout Jews from all over the earth were present, but the “gathering together” says more about the end of the exclusive covenantal relationship with the Jews and the extension of the New Covenant to all peoples. The “proof” of the end of the old age (covenant) and the expansion of the new age (covenant) is the destruction of the temple and city. This is also the proof that Jesus is at the right hand of the father.

  2. 3 Yeshua the Lord of Glory

    Thanks David

    If you have time i would like to ask you to read Polycarps blog. We have a very good discussion about these things…Very nice man,sincere and good natured like you.

    If you will just to get the background of our discussion start with his post” Armageddon Armageddon Pat Robertson see’s more Armageddon…There are about 24 comments there,short ones, with the acception of know who.

    Then see his top POSTS ” Was Penetecost the Regathering of Isreal “…

    David It is very very important that you click on the start HERE button FIRST.Then read CAREFULLY the ENTIRE discussion that Polycarp and i had… Then read his post of course and leave a comment if you like to…

    BTW: if you see anything thing in my comments that is inaccurate concerning you please please let me know, i will be sure to correct it…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: